![]() For example, the Calaveras skull, alleged to be hundreds of thousands of years old, was dated to 1000BP by radiocarbon dating methods (Taylor et al 1992). I am surprised by the plethora of uncritical readers in this forum. Cremo takes examples of archaeological artifacts and bones that are out of "insitu" context and makes fantastic historical claims regarding these specimens. Both the former and latter laws of archaeology must be satisfied to make any conclusion at all. He also fails to connote the "principal of association". ![]() Cremo sets out misinforming the reader about archaeological and geological site formation, confusing the "principle of stratigraphy" (superposition) with stratification. This book is a classic example of both a "strawman arguement" and a "red herring". Michael Cremo has set archaeology back more than 100 years. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |